Humber Squash Organisation

Player Rankings

Select your division below to display current player rankings.

Division 1 Division 2 Division 3 Division 4

Rank	Name	Team	Played	Sub	Won	Lost	Points
1.	Chris Grainger	Bridlington B	0	0	0	0	4341
2.	Paul Bell	Barrow	3	0	2	1	4066
3.	Levi Melarkey	Bridlington B	1	0	1	0	3520
4.	Jordon Clark	David Lloyd A	7	0	6	1	2709
5.	Nick Walster	Beverley D	5	0	4	1	2316
6.	Dean Rae	Barrow	6	0	6	0	2121
7.	Ian Cousins	Bridlington B	7	0	4	3	1822
8.	Scott Ratherham	Beverley D	4	0	4	0	1652
9.	Jacob Pymm	Barrow	10	0	7	3	1644
10.	Steve Yarrow	Barrow	0	0	0	0	1594
11.	Alfie Robinson	Beverley D	18	10	13	5	1522
12.	Lee Medlin	Haltemprice G	7	0	3	4	1325
13.	Max Hall	Beverley D	8	5	8	0	1315
14.	Jack Santana	Barrow	10	0	7	3	1295
15.	Marc Dawson	Beverley D	6	0	4	2	1286
16.	Greg Cousins	Bridlington B	9	1	5	4	1241
17.	Julian Morris	Bridlington B	7	0	5	2	1157
18.	Paul Coulson	Haltemprice G	8	1	3	5	1096
19.	Jack Walker	David Lloyd A	7	0	3	4	1025
20.	John Wormald	Barrow	8	0	4	4	871
21.	John Miller	Bridlington B	8	0	3	5	815
22.	Jonny Collinson	David Lloyd A	6	0	4	2	766
23.	Ian Parkin	Barrow	0	0	0	0	739
24.	Sean Clark	Beverley D	0	0	0	0	715
25.	Elliott Pearson	Haltemprice H	11	1	3	8	684
26.	Stan Anderson	Beverley D	8	1	2	6	643
27.	Luke Thundercliffe	David Lloyd A	4	2	2	2	631
28.	Jonty Allcock	Barrow	1	0	0	1	626
29.	Alastair Segal	Bridlington B	7	0	4	3	543
30.	Steve Schrimshaw	David Lloyd A	3	0	1	2	535
31.	Steve Smith	Haltemprice G	15	6	7	8	451
32.	Pete Coupland	Barrow	1	0	0	1	440
33.	Andy Sandilands	Haltemprice G	2	0	0	2	386
34.	Darren LeFevre	Barrow	1	0	0	1	310
35.	Susie Wilson	Beverley D	4	0	0	4	289
36.	Ash Flanagan	Haltemprice H	14	4	2	12	253
37.	Rich Lovelock	Haltemprice H	9	0	2	7	204
38.	Tom McCollin	Haltemprice H	10	1	0	10	0

The squash ranking system is based on the old England Squash system whereby if you beat someone above you, you move closer to him or her and he or she move closer to you. If you are within a certain range (in this case 250 points) you pass the person you beat. You also get credit for beating players behind you.

 

Each season, it will take a while for the ranking places to balance out as:

• Players improve between seasons
• New player's rankings are sometimes incorrect
• Results involving these players throw other players rankings out.

However, by Xmas the rankings settle down and by February they are a pretty true reflection, far better than most other ranking systems. The system works better than the England Squash system because a higher percentage of players play every week, ensuring any anomalies get ironed out over a period of weeks. At this stage you may see players who appear to be over or under ranked but if they keep winning / losing, they will soon reach their correct position.

 

The rankings for Hull & District are calculated on the following basis: If the winners score is lower than the losers score the points gain / loss is dependent on the point's difference.

• 500+ less, winner gets 25% of difference & loser loses 25% of the difference.
• 250 - 499 less, winner gets 40% of difference & loser loses 40% of the difference.
• 100 - 249 less, winner gets 60% of difference & loser loses 60% of the difference.
• 0 - 99 less, winner gets 80 points & loser loses 80 points.

If the winner has more points than loser, points gained / lost are Difference is less than 100, winner gains 60 points, and loser loses 60 points. If the difference is 100 points or more, winner gains 30 points & loser loses 30 points for a 3-0 victory, 20 points for a 3-1 and 10 points for a 3-2.

Player's start on points they finished on last year and new players are allocated ranking based upon position in ranking order. I have made adjustments for players moving up or down divisions.

All players will be on one complete ranking list so that players subbing can get credit for beating players in higher divisions.