Humber Squash Organisation

Player Rankings

Select your division below to display current player rankings.

Division 1 Division 2 Division 3 Division 4

Rank	Name	Team	Played	Sub	Won	Lost	Points
1.	James Crees	Riding B	0	0	0	0	6611
2.	Adam Yates	Bridlington A	9	0	9	0	5192
3.	Alex Yates	Bridlington A	7	0	7	0	4939
4.	Andy Douglas	Riding B	0	0	0	0	4829
5.	Steve Curtis	Beverley C	14	5	9	5	4636
6.	Craig Levesley	Haltemprice F	1	1	0	1	4343
7.	Josh Lee	Haltemprice E	15	5	9	6	4255
8.	Neil Hayward	Haltemprice F	6	1	4	2	2734
9.	Ian Cartwright	Riding B	0	0	0	0	2711
10.	Freddie Robinson	Beverley C	23	15	16	7	2578
11.	John Bannister	Bridlington A	9	0	7	2	2560
12.	Alex Wood	Haltemprice F	10	1	2	8	2445
13.	Jamie Melling	Haltemprice D	18	8	7	11	2441
14.	Lewis Durrant	Haltemprice D	8	0	6	2	2262
15.	Matt Rollinson	Beverley C	0	0	0	0	2258
16.	Robin Pearson	Blackburn B	0	0	0	0	2223
17.	Ben Innes	Haltemprice E	11	2	5	6	2167
18.	Joe Harrison	Haltemprice D	14	4	6	8	1957
19.	Marc Paish	Riding B	0	0	0	0	1672
20.	Jack Patrick	Blackburn B	2	0	0	2	1589
21.	Mark Bell	Bridlington A	11	2	10	1	1582
22.	Paul Found	Bridlington A	1	0	0	1	1422
23.	Nabs Khan	Haltemprice F	9	0	5	4	1393
24.	Tom Fewster	Haltemprice D	10	1	6	4	1222
25.	Hattie Langley	Beverley C	3	0	2	1	1209
26.	James Gabbatt	Haltemprice E	10	1	3	7	1088
27.	Karl Proctor	Haltemprice F	12	2	5	7	1038
28.	Rich Caley	Blackburn B	9	0	1	8	1021
29.	Adam Jordan	Blackburn B	3	0	0	3	910
30.	Jonathan Rollison	Beverley C	5	0	1	4	806
31.	Jack Davison	Haltemprice E	9	0	3	6	738
32.	Matty Harling	Beverley C	5	1	0	5	512
33.	James Rudge	Blackburn B	5	0	1	4	215
34.	Atchuthan Senthilkumar		0	0	0	0	180
35.	Jonathan Keough	Blackburn B	9	0	1	8	40
36.	Dan Patrick	Blackburn B	0	0	0	0	0

The squash ranking system is based on the old England Squash system whereby if you beat someone above you, you move closer to him or her and he or she move closer to you. If you are within a certain range (in this case 250 points) you pass the person you beat. You also get credit for beating players behind you.

 

Each season, it will take a while for the ranking places to balance out as:

• Players improve between seasons
• New player's rankings are sometimes incorrect
• Results involving these players throw other players rankings out.

However, by Xmas the rankings settle down and by February they are a pretty true reflection, far better than most other ranking systems. The system works better than the England Squash system because a higher percentage of players play every week, ensuring any anomalies get ironed out over a period of weeks. At this stage you may see players who appear to be over or under ranked but if they keep winning / losing, they will soon reach their correct position.

 

The rankings for Hull & District are calculated on the following basis: If the winners score is lower than the losers score the points gain / loss is dependent on the point's difference.

• 500+ less, winner gets 25% of difference & loser loses 25% of the difference.
• 250 - 499 less, winner gets 40% of difference & loser loses 40% of the difference.
• 100 - 249 less, winner gets 60% of difference & loser loses 60% of the difference.
• 0 - 99 less, winner gets 80 points & loser loses 80 points.

If the winner has more points than loser, points gained / lost are Difference is less than 100, winner gains 60 points, and loser loses 60 points. If the difference is 100 points or more, winner gains 30 points & loser loses 30 points for a 3-0 victory, 20 points for a 3-1 and 10 points for a 3-2.

Player's start on points they finished on last year and new players are allocated ranking based upon position in ranking order. I have made adjustments for players moving up or down divisions.

All players will be on one complete ranking list so that players subbing can get credit for beating players in higher divisions.