Humber Squash Organisation

Player Rankings

Select your division below to display current player rankings.

Division 1 Division 2 Division 3 Division 4

Rank	Name	Team	Played	Sub	Won	Lost	Points
1.	Matty Craven	Beverley B	12	3	11	1	8920
2.	Nick Padgett	Beverley B	1	1	1	0	8243
3.	Danny Roberts	Haltemprice A	14	4	9	5	7794
4.	James Crowther	Riding A	10	0	5	5	7562
5.	Ashley Foster	Beverley A	7	2	5	2	7558
6.	Andy Stott	Riding A	8	0	8	0	7532
7.	David Harris	Beverley B	7	2	7	0	7434
8.	Jack Dunn	Haltemprice C	10	0	6	4	7410
9.	Iain Taylor	Beverley A	12	4	6	6	7315
10.	Rob Pounder	Haltemprice B	9	2	2	7	7064
11.	Nathan Kaiser	Beverley A	3	1	0	3	6834
12.	Pete Bloor	Riding A	0	0	0	0	6749
13.	Olly Samuel	Blackburn A	12	0	5	7	6103
14.	Tom Earles	Riding A	12	0	8	4	6018
15.	Bob Marshall	Haltemprice A	12	1	6	6	5976
16.	Finlay Merrison	Haltemprice C	2	2	2	0	5633
17.	Brad Smith	Haltemprice A	11	2	10	1	5450
18.	Jacob Vahey	Haltemprice C	11	0	4	7	5128
19.	Andy Thomson	Beverley B	12	1	8	4	4838
20.	Alex Turner	Blackburn A	4	1	1	3	4739
21.	Jon Olner	Haltemprice B	11	2	6	5	4494
22.	Dave White	Beverley A	3	0	2	1	4474
23.	Robert Wray	Blackburn A	11	4	4	7	4029
24.	Shane Lindsay	Haltemprice A	12	1	4	8	3952
25.	Joe Cockshutt	Haltemprice C	11	1	11	0	3857
26.	Glen Scarah	Beverley B	6	1	3	3	3822
27.	Tom Cockshutt	Haltemprice C	11	0	4	7	3503
28.	Tim Powell	Beverley A	8	2	2	6	3437
29.	Stuart Boyle	Blackburn A	11	3	3	8	3382
30.	Edward Pearson	Haltemprice B	10	0	2	8	2647
31.	Seth Whitehurst	Riding A	9	0	3	6	2472
32.	Louie Mankel	Beverley A	1	0	0	1	2470
33.	Charlie Samuel	Blackburn A	6	0	0	6	1968
34.	Cameron Hassan	Riding A	9	0	2	7	1955
35.	Sam Bowlas	Blackburn A	12	3	4	8	1722
36.	James Howard	Haltemprice B	8	1	1	7	1441

The squash ranking system is based on the old England Squash system whereby if you beat someone above you, you move closer to him or her and he or she move closer to you. If you are within a certain range (in this case 250 points) you pass the person you beat. You also get credit for beating players behind you.

 

Each season, it will take a while for the ranking places to balance out as:

• Players improve between seasons
• New player's rankings are sometimes incorrect
• Results involving these players throw other players rankings out.

However, by Xmas the rankings settle down and by February they are a pretty true reflection, far better than most other ranking systems. The system works better than the England Squash system because a higher percentage of players play every week, ensuring any anomalies get ironed out over a period of weeks. At this stage you may see players who appear to be over or under ranked but if they keep winning / losing, they will soon reach their correct position.

 

The rankings for Hull & District are calculated on the following basis: If the winners score is lower than the losers score the points gain / loss is dependent on the point's difference.

• 500+ less, winner gets 25% of difference & loser loses 25% of the difference.
• 250 - 499 less, winner gets 40% of difference & loser loses 40% of the difference.
• 100 - 249 less, winner gets 60% of difference & loser loses 60% of the difference.
• 0 - 99 less, winner gets 80 points & loser loses 80 points.

If the winner has more points than loser, points gained / lost are Difference is less than 100, winner gains 60 points, and loser loses 60 points. If the difference is 100 points or more, winner gains 30 points & loser loses 30 points for a 3-0 victory, 20 points for a 3-1 and 10 points for a 3-2.

Player's start on points they finished on last year and new players are allocated ranking based upon position in ranking order. I have made adjustments for players moving up or down divisions.

All players will be on one complete ranking list so that players subbing can get credit for beating players in higher divisions.